
Taylor Swift's takedown of the
clueless male attorney hinting she made up her groping allegations had
women applauding—and also shows how far we still have to go.
By Erin Gloria Ryan, The Daily Beast
Taylor Swift’s outward-facing persona is a carefully cultivated one of adult birthday parties, and Fourth of July sleepovers,
and “candid” Instagram shots that look like they took at least a few
takes to perfect. But yesterday, Swift was unvarnished, angry,
sharp—and, for many women, stirring.
The pop star was testifying in a civil trial over an alleged groping incident that
occurred in 2013. A DJ named David Mueller originally sued Swift,
claiming that Swift got him fired by accusing him of reaching up her skirt
and grabbing her buttocks during a meet-and-greet in Colorado. Swift
countersued for $1, claiming that she wanted to send a message to all
women that “you can say no,” and that if David Mueller didn’t want to
get fired, he should have restrained himself from groping Taylor Alison
Swift.
During yesterday’s stint on the stand,
Swift referred to the attorney cross-examining her as “Gabe.” She was
pissed, and unintimidated, an avatar of female strength in the face of
an offense that nobody should have to deal with.
“I’m critical of your client sticking his hand under my skirt and grabbing my ass,” she said in response to Gabe the lawyer’s suggestion that her bodyguard should have stopped the groping.
When
Gabe the lawyer asked why none of the other people at the
meet-and-greet saw the groping, Swift retorted, “Because my ass is
located in the back of my body.”
Did anybody have a direct line of sight? “The only person who would have
a direct eye line is someone lying underneath my skirt and we didn’t
have anyone positioned there,” Swift spat.
Swift
seems aware that she’s in a much better position to face down the man
she alleges assaulted her than most women who have been similarly
groped. She’s rich and famous and white, for starters. She’s also facing
her alleged groper in a civil courtroom, where guilt is determined by a
“preponderence of evidence” standard rather than the “beyond a
reasonable doubt” standard applied in criminal court. She’s suing her
alleged attacker for $1, so anybody accusing her of trying to profit
from her alleged assault, or trying to get famous from her alleged
assault, would be barking up the wrong tree. She’s got plenty of money.
She’s got plenty of fame. She’d probably rather be almost anywhere else.
One of the more compelling aspects of
Swift’s crusade isn’t what she’s said. It’s why Swift’s testimony went
viral as empowerment theater, and the issues that virality highlights.
Swift
has meticulously crafted her public image from the beginning of her
career. She’s never been photographed drinking alcohol or taking drugs,
her relationships with men are discussed to but never graphically
displayed, she’s not a party girl.
Of course, the notion that in
order for assault to be legitimate, the assailed must be a saint is
hogwash. But often, when a woman accuses somebody of sexual harassment
or assault, her character goes on trial. What was she wearing? Has she
been known to engage in this sort of behavior consensually in the past?
Why was she out walking all alone so late at night? Why was she
drinking? Why would a woman go into a room alone with a man if she
didn’t want to have sex with him?
And, to an extent, Gabe the
Lawyer has tried to pull that on Swift. Why didn’t she end the
meet-and-greet after Mueller allegedly groped her? Why didn’t she say
something right away, to the right people?
But what happened to
Swift pales in comparison to what other women who come forward with
accusations of assault face. That’s because most victims aren’t as “perfect” as Swift.
Former Columbia University student Emma Sulkowicz, who carried the
mattress she was allegedly raped on as part of a performance art piece,
was attacked and doxed. So were her the other women who accused
Sulkowicz’s alleged attacker of assault.
In 2011, a Texas prosecutor accused
an 11-year-old rape victim of being a “spider” that somehow attracted
her own alleged gang rape by 20 teen boys and men. A 16-year-old girl
named Jada, who was raped while unconscious at a party, became a cruel meme.
R. Kelly has a long history of troubling to abusive relationships with young women. Somehow, he’s not a pariah. To paraphrase
a recent Soraya Nadia McDonald piece on The Undefeated, Kelly’s career
is a testament to how little many in society care about black women and
girls.
Even women who come forward and do the “right” thing face
long odds. States across the country house huge rape kit backlogs. It’s
hard to see sexual assault as something law enforcement takes seriously
when they’re not even doing the bare minimum to investigate it.
That’s
not to say that Swift’s case shouldn’t be taken this seriously. Rather,
the cathartic nature of Swift’s courtroom testimony highlight the
disparity between how seriously her case is being taken and the way
others’ cases are treated. Swift’s is the best-case scenario. For the
sake of every other woman, we’ve got a long way to go.
Tags
Entertainment